Leakoo
dreamertooth from patreon
dreamertooth patreon

[META] Vote - Charge Up Front?

🕑 Added 2020-04-04 14:05:19 +0000 UTC

Comments

CryptidKion

Charge up front, if they want to see stuff early or extra stuff like advertised, they have to pay you

ButtNumz

CUF is definately the way to go. As everyone else has said and also my personal opinion, it should be the default.

Greywin Tarroc

You work hard on your stuff. You should get paid for it. Even as a hobby, this takes up your time. Time you could spend doing anything. So I would have been fine with a up-front charge.

I ordinary hate paying the full amount for just a part, but... As long as Patreon isn't managing subscriptions a good way, it should be better to charge up front...

Daovala

Your works are still released publicly, so it's fair that they have to pay to get the content early if it actually taxes you.

Draos

charge up front. your providing a service and its only natural that your customers pay for the service before they get the service. its everywhere like that

kj78aa

Charge up front. It's also not fair to you - the creator - to be taxed for fake income.

WaffyPup

Charge up front. Don't enable bad behavior that causes lost profits.

The way I see it, I'm contributing not only for the artist's content going forward, but also for content I've enjoyed by the artist via other sources in the past. Definitely charge up front!

Saphiros

I'm surprised this isn't the only option yet

MGlBlaze

Asking for a charge up front seems perfectly reasonable. It's not fair to you that people skip out on payment and end up screwing you over with taxes on income you didn't actually get. I'm already a patron so it won't affect me in any significant way, so do what's better for you.

TehAngryXeno

What Luxxy said ^^

Luxxy Reaves

People shouldn't be able to freely game the system and get access to stuff that you clearly spent time and effort on! You deserve every pledge that you get to actually go through; screw those people that steal and disappear. They suck and they deserve to be punished for it.

Minus Underscore

I'm already a patron to a few people who do this and it just makes sense. But. I must admit that I was mislead into thinking that I'd be charged for "the first month" right away, and then after that would be normal. I had no clue I was being double charged. That makes no sense and is a weird way to punish patrons. I'm still okay with it though compared to the alternative, that people can just come and leave. Patreon taxing you for money you didn't make, this platform sounds shadier and shadier with it's little tricks to get extra money out of you and patrons.

Dargon

I've been that double-charged person a few times. I would absolutely prefer to learn to deal with that and wait until the beginning of the next month than to see creators lose money. It should be the default option, honestly.

Tigersolder

Charge up front. People who sign up will still get the same thing and if it is late in the month they can wait until the first of the next month.

Mike Sterling

Enable charge up front. Believe it or not, you are providing a service, and people that come in, sign up, then immediately leave before they can be charged are gaming the system to get content for free, which is absolutely stealing, in my opinion.

Dracon

I Agree

Amaura

Please enable charge up front. It's only fair to you. People being able to sign up then leave before the charge comes in is bad


More Creators