Cognitive Dissonance Podcast from patreon

Cognitive Dissonance Podcast patreon

Episode 433: Resistance From Within

🕑 Added 2018-09-08 16:01:24 +0000 UTC

Comments

Nicole Ramirez Lambeth

I finally looked up Crokin. GodDAMN that is an unfortunate looking woman.

Noo

Holy shit, Liz Kroken. I want to thank her for all the good times

The Gray Hunter

Alas, Kitch Bitch retired... but her FB page is still up.

Oxford Comma is Mandatory

There's an idea: 'bail is set at current national debt at time of gavel fall'.

The Gray Hunter

Hmmmm... episode 432 has the same “stories from the week”. Weird. Anyway, about jello... y’know gelatin used to be real hard to make, so when it became “instant” it was a big deal. There is a huge push to get housewives to use it for everything. Encase salmon in it.... or a ham! Other canned and instant foods were also pushed. So mix some evaporated milk, mayonnaise and a can of Vegemite together and pour it over the jello encased ham! On Facebook there is “the Kitch Bitch” who does a “What’s For Lunch!!!” post every so often. They will be the most disgusting recipe cards from the 1930s thru the 1960s. Mmmmmm.... kidneys with buckwheat groats! You should check Kitch Bitch out.

EffDee

Liz Crokin is really going to town on that vocal fry. Look up vocal fry on Youtube for a weird experience.

Yaro Kasear

I think for me, maybe I'm failing "the skeptic test" but I'm more inclined to believe Woodward over Kelly and Mattis. For one, Kelly and Mattis know they're fired almost immediately if it's confirmed they talked to Woodward, so they already have a bit of a credibility problem in that it's trivial for them to cover their asses. Another thing is this is Bob Woodward, whose written about presidents since Nixon and was one of the people instrumental in taking him down. I don't have credibility problems with Woodward. I do have credibility problems with Trump and the people who work for him. As to "Lodestar," the biggest issue I have with it is how much they keep waving the "I'm a conservative" flag in the op-ed. It makes me suspect they are doing so in an attempt to save Republican chances this midterm, as simply "supporting Trump" is enough of a possible election killer for them that if they can make Republicans look like they're really not on Trump's side they might try and stave off the possible blue wave. Another thing that bothers me is how readily they take the 25th Amendment off the table, which is where I call them out for being cowards. It's obvious Trump should be subject to the amendment's provisions, but notice how quickly they take that off the table. They don't want to get rid of their rubber stamp, and they're not confident that Pence will be effective facing off against a Democratic congress. Their entire position is "we're fighting against Trump, but we shouldn't get rid of him, everyone."