Sabine
patreon
Science News Nov 21
🕑 Added 2023-11-21 16:00:07 +0000 UTC[This is a transcript with links to references.]
Welcome everyone to yet another exciting week of science news. Today we’ll talk about why Mars glows green, an amazingly cool way to make magnets hover, a study which found that a supposed piece of alien tech isn’t alien tech, surprising absolutely no one, plans to use the entire moon as a gravitational wave detector, progress with D-wave’s quantum computer, why Saturn’s rings will temporarily become invisible, wires that learn, energy from indoor lights, and of course, the telephone will ring.
The European Space Agency has found that planet Mars is glowing green, and a group of astrophysicists says they know why. The data come from the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. The orbiter already detected a few green flickers in the atmosphere of Mars in 2020, but now they have more details. It turns out that the green glow is strong enough to be visible both from the planet’s surface and from above the atmosphere.
A group of astrophysicists looked at the data and just published a paper about this. They studied the spectral composition of the light and say that the glow comes about like this. Mars atmosphere is thin and mostly made of carbon dioxide. At about seventy kilometres altitude, the sunlight is strong enough to split the carbon dioxide into one carbon and two oxygen atoms. The strong winds on mars carry the oxygen atoms to the dark side where they recombine. The recombination mostly releases infrared light, which was measured already in 2012, but in the new paper they say it also creates the green glow.
It’s a completely different effect than the aurora that we have on earth. That light show is created when charged particles from the sun hit the atmosphere. They kick some electrons into higher atomic energy orbitals. When the electrons drop back down, they release energy in the form of light. This happens for different atoms and different orbitals, which is why the aurora can have several different colours. The Earth does have atmospheric glow too, but it’s not visible from the surface. It’s called an “airglow” or “nightglow” and also comes mostly from molecular recombination. Since Earth’s atmosphere is more complicated than that of Mars, on earth the nightglow it actually has different colours at different altitudes.
Well that was interesting, if you’d asked me yesterday, I’d have guessed nightglow is a makeup line, and airglow is that smug grin on the faces of people who fly first class.
Researchers from the Technical University of Denmark have found a way to make a magnet hover in the air. By spinning one magnet at a high speed, they have picked up a second magnet, which then rotates and hovers a set distance from the first magnet.
It’s all standard physics but just wasn’t known until someone discovered the phenomenon two years ago. In the new paper they now investigated this effect further and also explained the physics behind it. They found that the magnet that was “picked up” by the spinning magnet was basically racing to align itself with its spinning acquaintance, forcing it to also spin. And once it got spinning, the picked-up magnet was locked in position by its rotation. It would only stop spinning when the rotational energy decreased, allowing the magnetic forces to trump the spinning action.
As I keep saying, physics is basically magic.
Two astrophysicists from Arizona State University appear to be unhappy with one of their colleagues, the Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb, and they aired their disapproval in a recent pre-print.
Loeb is the guy who claimed a few years ago that an asteroid that passed through our solar system was alien technology. He then continued to make headlines with a variety of outlandish claims. His most recent attention grabber is that an object that struck the Earth in 2014 was of interstellar origin, so not from within our solar system, but from much farther away.
He supposedly “proved” this by trawling the ocean floor near where the object was projected to have fallen, just north of Papua New Guinea. There, he claims to have found nine metallic spherical objects called “spherules”. He says they must have come from interstellar space because of their supposedly unique chemical compositions that differs from that of meteorites from within our solar system. Oh yes, and he says the spherules might be evidence of alien technology because they contained beryllium, lanthanum, and uranium.
In the new paper now, the two astrophysicists from Arizona refute Loeb’s claims. They say that the composition of meteorites changes when they’re in water for a long time because some minerals get washed out and others not. They show that meteorites found in the Indian Ocean indeed are very similar to the supposed alien tech. They also checked the ion composition of the spherules and say they’re perfectly compatible with that of objects from the solar system. They conclude that the spherules are almost certainly not of interstellar origin.
Another recent paper supports this by saying the spherules were likely contaminated by human-caused pollution, such as coal ash.
In a nutshell: “I’m not sure what this is, therefore it’s alien tech” is not exactly a masterwork of logical deduction.
A team of researchers from Beijing Normal University have come up with a plan to measure gravitational waves by using the entire moon as detector.
Gravitational waves, aka ripples in spacetime, can result from violent astrophysical events like mergers of neutron stars and black holes. These waves distort space and time, and with that the matter that sits in it. It’s a tiny distortion but if you can very accurately measure the size of something large, you can track this distortion. This is how gravitational wave interferometers like LIGO work.
But gravitational waves come from many different sources and in many different frequencies. And just like telescopes, gravitational wave detectors are only sensitive in some parts of the spectrum.
If one could use the entire moon as a gravitational wave detector, one could measure the frequency range of roughly a tenth of a hertz to a Hertz. That’s because when a wave within that range hits the Moon, the moon will resonate which makes it easier to detect the signal.
In the new paper they propose to measure those tiny deformations of the moon with an array of very sensitive laser seismometers. One would then look for correlations between seismic events on different sites. They have worked out a design for the detectors that they say is robust, and that can also be deployed by autonomous robots brought there by China’s moon landers. Such a moon detector would measure gravitational waves in a frequency part that isn’t accessible to earth-based devices and also not to pulsar timing arrays or planned space-based mission.
A problem is, however, that the moon has what’s called “Thermal quakes”. Since the moon has no atmosphere, its surface warms very quickly when exposed to sunlight, and then cools very quickly in the shadow. This causes the rocks to contract and expand and creates small moon-quakes. It’s kind of like your car engine crackles after you turn it off. For this reason, they want to put the seismometers inside craters. Any resemblances to other devices is entirely coincidental.
You might have seen a few headlines recently saying Saturn’s rings will disappear in 2025. If you kept on scrolling because that seems just a bit too unbelievable, well, I looked at it and it turns out to be true… but it doesn’t mean what you might have thought it means.
You see, the Earth rotates on an axis that’s tilted relative to the plane in which it orbits around the sun. Our equator is tilted about 23 and a half degrees relative to that plane. Saturn spins on a similarly tilted axis, with its equator tilted by about 26 point seven degrees. Saturn’s rings now orbit the planet above its equator, so they also have that tilt.
The reason that Saturn’s rings are “disappearing” is because of this tilt, and because the rings are actually extremely thin. If you look at them edge-on, you basically can’t see them. It takes Saturn a bit more than 29 Earth years to go around the sun once. And twice during this Saturnian year, we, from Earth, look at the rings edge-on, so they seem to disappear.
Last time this happened was in 2009, and it’s expected to happen twice in 2025 – first in March, after which the rings will slightly come into view before disappearing again later in November.
So they’ll not disappear forever, just temporarily. However, Saturn’s rings are expected to eventually vanish entirely because the rocks they’re made of are gradually falling into the atmosphere. Estimates say they’ll last something between 20 and 400 million years.
I haven’t lost my wedding ring either, it’s just fallen into the atmosphere and evaporated.
A team of researchers from the University of Sydney and University of California at Los Angeles have taught new tricks to wires. Yes, wires.
They built a network of silver nanowires that’s able to adapt in real time when given feedback with electrical currents. Previous studies have shown that these networks have a sort of memory, but this is the first study that has shown they’re able to learn.
They call their device a nanowire network. It’s basically a physical realization of a neural network, that’s a computer program, which is itself modelled after the human brain. The wires respond to electrical signals kind of like neurons, by strengthening some connections of wires while weakening others.
The researchers demonstrated this real-time learning with a standard test for artificial intelligence. That’s an image recognition test based on a collection of sixty thousand single digits written in different handwriting. It’s provided by the US-American National Institute of Standards and Technology. For the test you train your system with the 60 thousand images and then use another 10 thousand to see how well it learned the lesson.
The wire network learned to tell the digits apart with an overall accuracy of 93 point 4 percent, that’s about as good as me without my contact lenses. That box of old cables in the corner over there really doesn’t think my jokes are funny.
Researchers from the quantum computing company D-Wave, a quantum computing company, say they’ve succeeded in bringing down errors in their newest device.
D-wave pursues a somewhat different approach to quantum computing than most companies. It’s called quantum annealing, and it’s a type of quantum simulation, so, basically a way to custom design a difficult optimization problem. The idea is that properly set up, the quantum system relaxes into an optimal state that answers your question. It’s kind of like settling into the most comfy position on a couch, but with quantum tunnelling and entanglement.
Since it’s got something to do with quantum and with computing, I think it’s fair to call it quantum computing. But the approach is very different from that pursued by IBM and Google and many others who try to develop what’s known as a universal quantum computer that can execute algorithms.
Quantum annealers have the advantage that they might get to commercially interesting applications faster, but they suffer from the same problem as all quantum computers. It’s that the quantum states are very fragile and noise-sensitive, which brings in errors. The duration for which quantum states maintain their quantum properties is called the “coherence time”.
The D-wave people now report in a new pre-print that they’ve been able to correct some errors in their new computer and thereby effectively increase the coherence time by a factor of 10. They did it with what they call a Zero-Noise Extrapolation. For this you deliberately expose the quantum computer to various amounts of noise and observe the result. Then you extrapolate to zero noise.
--That’s really clever.
Hi Elon,
Yes, I am mightily impressed you built the world’s biggest rocket.
Ah, don’t worry about space-travel, just think of it as fireworks. Keeps people on twitter, too, what more could you want!
Inner Peace? Have you been watching TikTok again?
Elon?
A group of material scientists from the Fraunhofer institute in Freiburg, Germany says they’ve found a way to power smart homes: by using solar panels indoors.
That a home is smart doesn’t mean it has a PhD, it means its devices are connected to the internet and can be controlled from a phone or computer. And while most of those devices don’t take up a lot of energy, the energy to power them still needs to come from somewhere.
The idea of the new paper is that you use the energy from artificial lights that’s otherwise lost into oh-so slightly warming up surfaces in the room. This sounds rather obvious, I know, but the problem is that solar panels are usually optimized to work with sunlight, and artificial indoor light has a different spectrum.
The researchers tested eight different types of photovoltaic cells and found that the ones best suited for indoor lights were those made of gallium indium phosphide. The good news is that they were remarkably efficient, turning about 40 percent of the light energy that hit them into electricity. They also retained the energy really well. The bad news is that they’re also the most expensive ones.
In case you wonder now why no one’s thought of charging a cell-phone with a lamp, it’s because it’d take forever and then you’d miss the science news.
The quiz for this video is here.
Comments
Hope, I don´t gain enemies now, but I like them just like other mammals, like cats, whose teeth are even bigger and sharper. But, regardless of the species, they shouldn´t reproduce exponentially in my basement.
And now for something very important so far not discussed here: Rats. Yes, rats! You know? Hairy, beady eyes, hairless tail, big sharp teeth, burrow everywhere, reproduce exponentially (a correct, non-hyped use of this word for once), with collapsible skeletons that let them go through tiny holes in walls, strong prehensile hands, too smart for our own good . In other words: Rats. A world-wide pest and a threat to our way of life. Carriers of disease, occasionally attack people, etc. https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/animals/a45861989/rats-in-new-york-city/? Even if this article concentrates on the old and infamous, but by now dire rat problem in New York City, it also makes clear that it applies worldwide, including other big cities, as it seems that the second most numerous of all animal species on Earth, after ours is, you guessed it: Rats!
As to those rings of Saturn that, being long-term dynamically unstable, have a finite time to exist: This is one of several reasons I so admire this guy for what he did: When people, because the telescopes were not good enough yet, could not see galaxies as they were, but as just fuzzy bright clouds (nebulae) some indefinite distance away, and not as mainly disk-shaped big bunches of slowly orbiting stars around a central point with something massive there keeping them from drifting away, all turning in the same way to avoid star crashes depleting the galaxy -- something this man figured out from Newtonian first principles, in the 17th Century!, the Milky Way had to be: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Natural_History_and_Theory_of_the_Heavens Excerpts: "Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens" (German: Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels), subtitled "or an Attempt to Account for the Constitutional and Mechanical Origin of the Universe upon Newtonian Principles", is a work written and published anonymously by Immanuel Kant in 1755." "Kant proposes the nebular hypothesis, in which solar systems are the result of nebulae (interstellar clouds of dust) coalescing into accretion disks and then forming suns and their planets. He also discusses comets, and postulates that the Milky Way is only one of many galaxies. For the long history of how this realization came about and was finally observationally confirmed last century: https://www.loc.gov/collections/finding-our-place-in-the-cosmos-with-carl-sagan/articles-and-essays/modeling-the-cosmos/the-milky-way-one-of-the-many-galaxies In a speculative proposal, Kant argues that the Earth could have once had a ring around it like the rings of Saturn. He correctly theorizes that the latter are made up of individual particles, likely made of ice." Yes, Earth most likely had a ring of rocks, not ice, made of leftovers from the violent formation of the Moon. And Kant did not had the means to know if any of this was true or not. He just trusted his own mind, and Newton.
