Sabine
patreon
Science News Sep 27
🕑 Added 2023-09-26 16:56:54 +0000 UTC[This is a transcript with links to references.]
Welcome everyone to this week’s science news. Today we’ll talk about raisins. Yes, raisins. Quasars with dark matter halos, pink diamonds, the last moments of a dying satellite, a new type of qubit, maybe, how to measure the length of the day with lasers, a new treatment method for brain cancer that’s got something to do with quantum mechanics, whether climate change drives migration, and of course, the telephone will ring.
Before we start, I have a service announcement, so to speak, which is that this video comes with a quiz on Quizwithit.com. This lets you check how much you remember, and you can collect points by taking quizzes for our other videos. This app is brand new, and we’re still working on it. If you subscribe this will help us develop the app further and make it available to other creators. So, give it a try and let us know what you think.
The most fun paper of the week comes from Saverio Spagnolie, a professor of mathematics at the university of Wisconsin-Madison, and his collaborators. They studied the behaviour of raisins in carbonated water. They got interested in this after Spagnolie and his young daughter observed raisins dancing in water. The gas attached to the raisins, that lifted them up, and when they reached the surface, the bubbles at the top popped, causing the raisins to sink, bob, and start rising again.
To study the effect, Spagnolie and his collaborators 3D-printed some small spheres and submerged them in carbonated water.
Carbonated water is supersaturated with carbon dioxide. This basically means there’s too much carbon dioxide in the water for it to stays dissolved at normal pressure. It stays in the water only so long as you keep it in a closed bottle which exerts pressure.
If you remove the pressure, it bubbles out and those bubbles usually form around some kind of condensation seed, like a crack or a rough surface. The researchers now observed that when the spheres were kept stationary, the bubbles grew on the surface fairly regularly. When the spheres were allowed to move freely, however, their bubbles allowed them to rise to the top and then sink back down. This continued as long as the concentration of gas in the liquid what high enough so that the bubbles could lift the spheres. They then created a computer simulation to quantify the effect.
Dancing raisins probably won’t have a lot of applications, but supersaturated solutions do occur in the real world, such as with the gas bubbles that push magma toward the surface of a volcano, so it’s not an entirely academic question.
Maybe that’s why we speak of raisin a question?
New researchout of Japan shows that dark matter halos around quasars don’t grow as expected, creating yet another puzzle in cosmology.
A quasar is a type of active galactic nucleus, it’s a supermassive black hole which draws in matter, heats it up, and in that process radiates off a lot of energy. Quasars are incredibly bright, but don’t quite look like stars. That’s why they’re called quasars, they’re quasi stars.
But the universe was not born with quasars all in place. Physicists believe that it takes dark matter plus time to make a quasar. You see, if dark matter exists, which it may not, then there’s much more of this matter in the universe than the normal type of matter that quasars and we are made of. The current estimates say about 80 percent of matter in the universe is dark matter. But this is the average for the entire universe. Galaxies are usually more than 90 percent dark matter.
Yes, the Milky Way too is more than 90 percent dark matter. If dark matter exists, which it may not. Dark matter in galaxies is believed to not form disks but spherically clouds that spread out far beyond the distribution of the visible stars. These clouds are called dark matter halos.
Now, if normal matter begins to collapse under the pull of its own gravity, it gets hot and that creates radiation, and that radiation creates pressure. This pressure acts against the collapse. Dark matter doesn’t create radiation, which is why it clumps faster in the early universe.
And since there’s so much dark matter around, once it’s clumped, it attracts the normal matter which also clumps. This creates galaxies and some of those galaxies will go on to form supermassive black holes in their centre. So now you have a quasar in a dark matter halo. The amount of dark matter in the halo affects how the galaxies are distributed, and since the quasars sit in the halo, you can use the distribution of quasars to approximately infer the mass of the dark matter halos.
This was previously done for nearby quasars, but in the new paper they looked at about 100 really far away quasars, at around a redshift of six, that’s about eight billion light years away. They found that quasars at that distance tend to have dark matter halos with a mass roughly 10 trillion times the mass of our sun. The weird thing is now that that’s about the same as the halo mass of the much younger quasars. This is somewhat confusing because as the universe gets older the dark matter halos combine and grow and keep on growing. You’d expect that younger quasars have larger halos.
They say that part of the reason may be that their sample is biased, especially because they’ve missed some of the fainter quasars. They also say there might be some kind of feedback from the quasars into their environment that prevents them from growing. Kind of like YouTube channels stop growing because they appeal to people who don’t like large YouTube channels.
This one isn’t a huge problem for astrophysicists because the growth of quasars quite plausibly depends on a lot of variables that are not very well known. However, to me it generally adds to the feeling that something isn’t quite right with this dark matter story and that, at the very least, it’s more complicated than we thought it is. What do you think, Albert?
Researchers from Curtin University in Australia say they’ve figured out how to find pink diamonds.
Natural diamonds form when carbon encounters extreme heat and pressure deep within Earth. Pink diamonds are incredibly rare and therefore especially sought for. The colour is caused by defects in the crystal lattice that change how they absorb light.
Geologists have known for some while that pink diamonds are more likely to be found in areas where tectonic plates meet because creating those lattice defects requires a lot of force that the tectonic plates supply. But why they’re found in some such areas and not others has remained somewhat unclear.
For the new paper now, the scientist studied the geological past of the Argyle Diamond Mine which closed in 2020. It was located in the East Kimberley region of Western Australia, and was famous in particular for its pink diamonds.
The researchers used ultra-thin laser beams to evaporate rocks in the region and date them. They found the region to be roughly 1 point 3 billion years old, that’s 100 million years older than previously believed. This is relevant because it means that the region likely formed when an ancient supercontinent called Nuna broke apart. The researchers say this created gaps in the Earth’s crust that allowed for the flow of magma.Wwhen the magma rose to the surface, it likely brought the pink diamonds with it.
Now that we have a better idea of where pink diamonds come from, this might give mining companies a clue what conditions to look for to find more pink diamonds. It’s not all that easy though because such old volcanoes can be difficult to recognize after they’ve been covered up by sediments for billions of years, so maybe have a look under the couch.
The European Space Agency’s Aeolus satellite has met its demise. After nearly five years of collecting wind data, ESA guided the satellite back through the atmosphere over the Antarctic, where it burnedup.
Aeolus was the first satellite mission to capture global data for wind patterns, able to measure wind speed to an accuracy of just two meters per second. But after four years, elevens months, and six days of collecting data, it ran out of fuel and dropped down from the sky, a fate that will be familiar to many graduate students.
Today’s international regulations require that satellites must be removed from orbit within 25 years of their retirement, and spacecraft are now built to minimize the risk of damage upon re-entering Earth’s atmosphere.
But Aeolus was designed in the 1990s, a simpler time, when people worried about kids getting addicted to Tamagotchis not about space debris falling onto their head, so this was a much-anticipated event.
The mission team couldn’t leave the satellite in space but it’s not great for international relations to let space junk randomly fall down somewhere. Not that China seems to care much,but Europe isn’t China, and ESA therefore decided that let Aeolus re-enter the atmosphere over the Antarctic, because fuck those penguins.
In the end, it all went well. The satellite re-entered Earth’s atmosphere over Antarctica as planned and turned into a bright hot fireball for roughly two minutes before burning up more or less entirely.
That’s the future of retirement in Europe: They’ll burn you up above antarctica.
Physicists in Texas claim to have developeda highly magnetic material that could make quantum computing at room temperature possible. That’s what the press release says anyway.
Most of the existing quantum computers must remain in super cold environments to pzevent quantum entanglement between them from fading away. The cost and inconvenience of this extreme cooling is currently the major obstacle to building larger quantum computers.
In the new paper now, the researchers report they have created a material that is superparamagnetic. A paramagnetic material is different from the usual magnets that you have on your fridge or so, in that its magnetism only appears in response to a magnetic field. Paramagnetism can therefore be controlled, which makes it interesting for computing. Superparamagnets are strong paramagnets. The ones that the researchers created are 100 times more magnetic than iron, and they maintain these properties at room temperature. This is really interesting because such tiny controllable magnets could be used to store information and process it. So, yes, it could be useful for computing.
--But this doesn’t mean we can now build room temperature quantum computers. It takes a little more to do that. Most importantly you’d have to demonstrate that those bits of information can be entangled and that those quantum links remain stable, at room temperature. So, yeah, it’s interesting but not as interesting as the press release made it sound.
Hello,
Ah Mr Rishi Sunak,
Because someone asked me the other day who’s this Richi who keeps calling.
Yes, I saw that, no heavy handed measures like sorting your rubbish into seven bins. I think that’s great, there’s no way I could sort the rubbish in my inbox with just seven bins.
Thanks for calling in!
Having a long day? It’s not just a saying, some days are really longer than others. But just how much? Thanks to scientists in Germany and New Zealand it’s now simpler than ever meausure how long our days are.
The Earth doesn’t always rotate at exactly the same speed. It’s because it’s not just one big solid ball but has parts sloshing around. The atmosphere, water, and also the liquid core don’t move at the same rate as the surface. But since angular momentum is conserved, if some of the sloshy bits move faster, earth has to rotate a little slower. Granted, it’s not a huge effect, but it can be a few milliseconds a day.
Enter big “G,” the laser gyroscope at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell in Germany. Big G uses laser beams whose wavelengths are known very exactly. The light travels several meters around in a square in two opposite directions. Depending on how the direction of the laser light is aligned with the rotation of earth, the wavelength of the light is either stretched or squeezed. When the two beams come together again, the difference in wavelengths encodes the speed of rotation of earth.
That way, scientists have been able to pin down the length of the day to a precision of a few milliseconds. The precision is comparable to other methods, but the nice thing about this method is that it delivers data about the rotational speed within one hour.
So if you feel like you’ve had a long day, all you need is a room with a laser gyroscope to make your case.
A multidisciplinary team of researchers in the UK has developed a new method of brain tumour treatment. They call it the first “quantum therapeutic” for cancer. Well, wow. I don’t normally talk about cancer treatment, but how could I resist something with quantum in it!
The idea is this. Cells use quantum effects, notably this is quantum tunnelling of electrons which plays a role for some chemical reactions. The researchers use nanoscopic gold particles that they put into an electric field, which polarizes them. The gold nanoparticles have other molecules attached to them which can launch some of those electron transfers and that can damage cells which they die. They call these things “bio-nanoantannae”.
The researchers measured the effects of these nanoantennae using several cell cultures, some cancerous and some not. They found that the cells absorbed the nanoparticles readily within eight hours. Then they exposed the cells to electromagnetic fields to polarize the nanoantenna. Some of the cancerous cells, especially those of some types of aggressive brain tumours showed markedly decreased metabolic activity afterwards. The metabolic activity was also decreased for healthy cells but not as much.
This is all well and fine I guess, but it’s a far away from application, and the link to quantum effects is somewhat of a stretch. I mean, as I keep saying, all of chemistry is quantum physics anyway. Though I have the feeling that, bio-quantum-nano-antennas in the brain could make for very interesting headlines indeed.
We’ve heard a lot about how climate change supposedly drives migration. But a group of researchers from Finland says that it’s not the climate that prompts people to leave their home provinces or countries, but rather socioeconomic factors, at least for now.
In their new paper, the authors collected data for birth and death rates as well as population stats from more than two hundred countries. They then compared this information with data from the Human Development Index, as well as each region’s aridity index.
They found that between the years 2000 and twenty nineteen, aridity, or dryness caused by lack of precipitation, was not the biggest factor in driving migration. Instead, socioeconomic factors from the overall development of the region had the biggest impact.
There are a few issues here. First, aridity isn’t the only problem caused by climate change. Second, difficult environmental conditions are correlated with socioeconomic factors. And third, as the researchers themselves admit, many people who might want to leave a region simply can’t do so, if those socioeconomic conditions are not in their favour.
But if a tree falls in a forest and no migration researcher is there to hear it maybe it didn’t happen.
Comments
Wie miaut man auf deutsch?
Finally! And thanks for clearing up this confusion. So that is obvious now. Does she have a German-tinged meow?
Sorry Oscar, I took a screenshot of the comments section and uploaded it to Google Drive then posted the link. The 3 photos of the brown cat in the screen-shot are of the feline Sabine.
Colleen, I just did as you told me, and got a screenshot with three cat photos. But no cat names, just the names of those posting these pictures, and no access to comments. Is "Sabine" the top one? I think, stretching things somewhat, that there is a certain resemblance, particularly in posture.
Collen, sorry, but it turns out in this "Crappy Cat Photos" Web Site comments can be seen by "members only." So this mouse did not get to bell it.
Since cats have entered the conversation here's a Facebook post from a pet-focused group I'm in of a cat named Sabine that I think resembles our Sabine, with non-blurry cat-Sabine in the comments: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2401607620079423/permalink/3557066794533494/?mibextid=Nif5oz
Why should one bring MOND and other theorems, which are under discussion, together? The inertia-free gravity explains everything - even quantitatively - without any rest.
Interesting episode
Fuck diamonds before fucking penguins, I reckon. But then I'm fairly poor so I'm pretty sour on that sort of extravagance which also damages the environment that's mined for them. I'm also wondering what happens if one puts MOND and Dark Matter theorems together under great pressure. What sort of hypotheses pop out?
Rad Antonov
Apparently you can’t even get unbiased science news these days. For anyone interested in learning about both sides of a story, a recent PRL looks at how LIGO could be of use in detecting dark matter. Lay person’s explanation here: https://physicsworld.com/a/gravitational-waves-could-reveal-dark-matter-transforming-neutron-stars-into-black-holes/ and PRL here: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.091401.
Is this your own theory? If not, what is it called? Can you provide the name of one or two publications in a science journal, other than in a predatory one, like MDPI, or in ArXiv and not yet peer reviewed? Thanks.
>>> Dark matter observation “creating yet another puzzle in cosmology”. <<< This observation does not create another puzzle, but confirms the only working explanation for the dark matter phenomenon that currently exists. It is another theory of gravity (but not MOND!!). This gravity was almost found by Einstein in 1911 when he studied the general influence of the fact that the speed of light decreases in a gravitational field. (Unfortunately he used a wrong formula for this dependence and broke off this way). This theory of gravity states that gravity has nothing to do with inertia/mass. But every elementary particle makes the same contribution to the field. According to this approach, photons also contribute significantly to the gravitational field; thus, they are the "dark" particles. It is easy to prove this approach. If one calculates the rotation curves on this basis, not only the shape of the curves but also their absolute height is obtained with good accuracy (and of course without any adaptation of parameters). The results of the CLASH collaboration also confirm this approach. With this new observation, it is not weird that the "dark matter" of the quasars is 10 trillion times the number of particles in the sun. This number describes the number of photons in this environment. And, of course, it is no surprise that the young quasars have the same amount of "dark matter" as the old ones. Why should the numbers be different? The radiation from the old and young quasars is not significantly different. And it is clear that this "halo" of photons surrounding all galaxies enhances the growth of the galaxies because it increases the gravitational field around them many times over (see rotation curves). And it's also no surprise that the halo is spherical, since that's how the photons spread out. So thank you very much for this report. It is another confirmation of the photon-approach to dark matter.
Where is the quiz page?
And that is why champagne goes flat. Bubbling raisins: there may be an Ig Nobel Prize in there. Using lasers for measuring Earth rotation (or more precisely, Earth rotation variations, some due to processes internal to the Earth, some due to sub-diurnal tides, as well as the orientation of the Earth's rotation axis in space, as well as the difference in lat. and long. between where the conventional North geographic pole is and the actual pole of rotation that moves around (i.e. polar motion), plus two other things known as "x and y offsets", the latter four and the rotation variations collectively known as "Earth Orientation Parameters", or EOP) has been around using powerful lasers to track satellites equipped with retroreflectors, since the late Sixties (I have worked, at a later date, with the people that developed the method at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center). And this way of measuring Earth's spin has been around since then (there is another one, using dedicated radio-telescopes around the world to observe, interferometrically, quasars, also mentioned (the quasars) here by Sabine; plus tracking, using their radio signals, navigation satellites such as those of GPS, GALILEO, etc.), now with perfected laser systems where the received reflected photons are detected with an optical telescope and counted at the one-photon level. But it takes a number of laser stations (mainly in Europe) and is not a near real-time process, while the one mentioned by Sabine, that fits in a lab (with specialized equipment such as an air table and lots optical bits and pieces on it, I imagine), that is a variation of the ring laser, with those counter-rotating beams, works much faster than the one with the radio telescopes and satellites. But its name "Big G" is confusing, because that is generally understood to be what the gravitational constant is called. Then, there have been proposals for making super-gyroscopes using the Hall effect, but I have not heard much about those for quite a few years. I wonder if Sabine, or someone else here has. I also wonder if pink lasers, rare as the may be, may be more interesting to lapidaries and gemologists, or to show-off very wealthy ladies ("See these rocks in my pendants? They are pink diamonds, so super-expensive, darling!") than to most couples getting engaged, that are the main buyers. After all, DeBiers has been, with relentless propaganda, teaching all of us that, to be of ring quality, they must be colorless and transparent. Even if they are not all of these pulled off Mother Earth: https://www.jewellermagazine.com/Article/10078/DeBeers-lab-created-diamonds-direct-to-consumers-it-was-always-going-to-happen (Scroll down, past the fancy ads, to read the interesting article.)
The quiz page does not load for me
